Hi, kids!
It’s time once again to turn a jaundiced eye toward the newsmakers of the day – the winners and losers – who, in my cynical opinion, either contributed to our quality of life, or detracted from it, in some significant way.
Let’s look at who tried to screw us – and who tried to save us – during the week that was:
Asshole Volusia County Council
Barker’s First Rule of Citizen Engagement: Never underestimate the arrogance and stupidity of government…
A disturbing groupthink has evolved in government, now involving the misuse of the legislative process to pursue nonsensical laws and ordinances as a means of distraction, diversion, and control, cloaked as a conscience-soothing “look, we’re doing something!” exercise – an empty ego-massage that does nothing to further the public good while Rome burns…
Sound familiar?
It should…
Anyone remember the early days of the Coronavirus, when local elected and appointed powermongers banned their shut-in subjects from visiting Volusia County beaches?
A few of our panic-stricken “leaders” even suggested an expensive fence be erected to physically block us from the shore – ultimately settling on hundreds of ugly plastic markers to keep us an easily enforceable 25-feet apart – limiting our lawful right to assemble to groups of six or less, using drones to monitor our behavior?
Though most craven politicians would prefer We, The Little People forget how we were abused by “the system,” citizens will long remember that it was always about power and control – not public safety – as those we elected to represent our interests used the United States Constitution for toilet paper and flexed their legislative muscle under interminable “emergency declarations.”
Welcome back to the ‘bad old days,’ folks…
For years, there has been a law on the books in Florida requiring that motorists obey traffic control devices (FSS 316.074) – defined by statute as signs, signals, markings, and other measures that are placed by a public body for the purpose of regulating, warning, or guiding traffic.
The law carries a stiff penalty, with fines now reaching $264.00 per incident, including three points assessed against a violator’s license and increased insurance premiums.
For reasons known only to him, earlier this year, Volusia County Councilman Danny “Draco” Robins – a self-described “limited government Republican” – announced he wanted to rain ‘deterrence and repercussions’ on hapless motorists caught in floodwaters who disregard traffic control measures during a state of emergency.
So, Robins proposed what he dubbed a “Stupid Motorists Law” an asinine ordinance which would force drivers who avoid a barricade or enter a flooded roadway to pay fines of $500, face 60 days in jail, or both…
Apparently, the ordinance was modeled on an Arizona law that permits government entities to charge motorists who enter floodwaters for the cost of their rescue.
Last Tuesday, the same detached assholes that refuse to address the clear and present danger of stormwater mismanagement, acknowledge the correlation between the change in topography brought by malignant growth and the widespread flooding that has resulted in devastation across Volusia County, and ignore calls for smart growth initiatives to contain runoff, voted unanimously to pass what I call “Danny’s Law” – a redundant cudgel that penalizes you and I – now that streets and thoroughfares that once remained high and dry quickly become impassable during rain events.
Bullshit.
To shore up his bullying overreach, Robins sent a letter to Sheriff Mike Chitwood and a few area police chiefs asking for support (what else were they going to do, say no?).
Councilman Robins also directed County Attorney Michael Dyer to include a series of out-of-context photographs and social media posts from area law enforcement in the council agenda package depicting high-water rescues apparently during Hurricane Ian – exploiting the pain of residents caught in floodwaters through no fault of their own.
In an even more bizarre stretch, At-Large Councilman Jake Johansson said, “Being a whitewater rafter and whatnot, I’ve seen people who’ve tipped their kayaks over and get caught underneath a tree,” he said. “… I don’t want that to happen anyway in Volusia County, so hopefully we can stop the madness.”
Wait. Kayaks?
Say what?
Look, during weather emergencies, sometimes motorists get caught out, stalled in rapidly rising floodwaters, and forced to make tough decisions. That was a consideration of Chairman Jeff Brower, who wondered if the ordinance would apply to homeowners who live on flood prone streets? (And we all live on flood prone streets now.)
Of course it will.
Because this unnecessary “law” is specifically designed to punish – despite the quibbling of a Volusia County Assistant Attorney tasked with wasting valuable time on this hogwash, who said, “…those circumstances would be taken into consideration, and residents of affected streets would be allowed to enter and exit their homes safely.”
My ass.
So, if I understand it (and I am not sure I do), the County Attorney is saying we can ignore a traffic control device if we are trying to get home?
When does this new ordinance apply?
I’m asking.
In my view, this is just another cheap powerplay to divert our attention away from the core issue of countywide flooding – and Volusia County’s total inaction on determining cause or mitigating the incredibly expensive recurring impacts…
During my three decades in public service, whenever storm clouds gathered, law enforcement officers and first responders routinely sought to help others – rescuing those in danger, and, more often, simply pushing disabled vehicles out of standing water and escorting stranded occupants to safety.
Even when the driver made a stupid mistake in response to conditions not of their own making…
It’s called serving and protecting.
In my view, fining and imprisoning confused residents during a dynamic emergency is wrong – and this new ordinance has nothing to do with giving law enforcement a beneficial arrow in its quiver – and everything to do with political grandstanding.
Unfortunately, I don’t think Danny is done with his reign of ‘deterrence and repercussions’ – as he continues pouring over the books, translating existing statutes into county ordinances, ad infinitium – in a never-ending quest to waste more time and resources for his own weird self-aggrandizement.
Back when I served in government, I once worked for a plainspoken police chief who often got my attention with the terse reminder, “Pull your head out of your ass, Barker. Focus on what’s important.”
That’s sound advice – especially for policymakers who are humble enough to accept constructive criticism…
With appropriate laws and regulations already in place, why do our officious doctrinaires in DeLand spend so much valuable time devising supercilious ways of squeezing more, more, more out of their already strapped constituents while wholly ignoring the serious civic, environmental, and economic threats we face?
Madness, indeed.
Angel Ormond Beach Chamber of Commerce
This week, the Ormond Beach Chamber of Commerce sent a letter to the Volusia County Council lending its powerful voice in support of an innovative Dog-Friendly Beach pilot program that District 4 Councilman Troy Kent proposed earlier this year.
With dogs currently limited to two small areas of Ponce Inlet and New Smyrna Beach – Mr. Kent hopes to establish a more convenient area to accommodate dogs on a leash in Ormond Beach.
In March, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service nixed the idea of a trial program near Bicentennial Park in Ormond-by-the-Sea, citing concerns about dogs in a designated natural beach management area, which required the Council consider a location farther south.
As often happens when someone dares to challenge the stagnant status quo, Councilmen Danny “Draco” Robins and Matt Reinhart voted to quash Councilman Kent’s proposal.
Why?
I assume because Mr. Robins abhors anything that might be enjoyable for residents – and Mr. Reinhart hasn’t had an original thought since he took his seat in January – apparently finding it easier to simply follow his buddy’s lead…
Unbelievably, the idea was first proposed by Mr. Kent in January – and the rusty wheels of bureaucratic procrastination continue to grind ever so slowly.
In my view, this is a perfect example of county government taking a simple suggestion – the establishment of a small area on our 47-miles of beach to accommodate pets – and making it so onerous, complicated, and expensive that it takes the fun out of the concept, paints any elected official who supports it as a spendthrift, and exasperates supporters until they simply give up and go away.
Even with a generous donation of $100,000 in start-up funds offered by Ormond Beach philanthropists Nancy and Lowell Lohman – we were told if the project were approved – it would be at least November before the proposed trial period would begin.
According to an article by Jarleene Almenas writing in the Ormond Beach Observer this week:
“The Ormond Beach Chamber of Commerce supports a one-year pilot program in Ormond Beach, its board of directors wrote in a June 26 letter to County Council Chair Jeff Brower.
“We believe implementing a Dog-Friendly Beach pilot program in Ormond Beach would enhance our community’s livability and attractiveness as a tourist destination,” the letter states. “It aligns with the values of inclusivity and responsible pet ownership while fostering a stronger sense of community among residents.”
A year, the chamber stated, would give the county enough time to evaluate the program’s effectiveness and address concerns to determine its long-term viability and impact on beachgoers.
“We believe implementing a Dog-Friendly Beach pilot program in Ormond Beach would enhance our community’s livability and attractiveness as a tourist destination,” the letter states. “It aligns with the values of inclusivity and responsible pet ownership while fostering a stronger sense of community among residents.”
I agree.
According to the report, at a recent meeting, the Ormond Beach City Commission began to waffle – getting weak in the knees after Commissioner Harold Briley received “several emails” from residents of a “condo-hotel” located south of the Rockefeller beach approach “expressing concerns.”
That discussion prompted Mr. Briley to inquire if his “colleagues” wanted to pull the old Ormond Beach Flippity-Floppity and pull their initial support for the proposal?
Like the good political crawfish he is, Mayor Bill Partington mewled, “It’s a strange situation that instead of picking the most logical, commonsense spot for it, they chose (a location) in front of people’s homes,” Partington said. “I don’t think it’s the correct place for it.”
Whatever.
Apparently, Mayor Partington doesn’t bother staying abreast of issues facing his constituents (unless, of course, their concerns are written on the back of a campaign check), so he is clearly unaware that moving the location of the pilot was necessitated by eleventh-hour environmental concerns brought by the USFWS, who hold Volusia County’s Incidental Take Permit which protects shorebirds, sea turtles, and other threatened species.
Now, the usual fear-mongers are telling flashlight-under-the-chin scary stories that a dog-friendly beach could potentially violate the permit and end our century-old tradition of beach driving…
Bullshit.
The Volusia County Council will take another look at Mr. Kent’s proposal on July 11.
Don’t hold your breath…
Anything inventive or enjoyable rarely comes to fruition here on the “Not-So-Fun Coast.”
Something tells me the all-powerful bureaucratic machine is working overtime in the bowels of the Thomas C. Kelly Administration Building to puff-up costs, erect hurdles, and ensure that Mr. Kent’s suggestion ends up in the same fetid shit-trench that every one of Chairman Jeff Brower’s campaign promises landed in…
Look, we may disagree, and there are a lot of legitimate NIMBY arguments to be made – but I agree with the Ormond Beach Chamber – establishing a dog-friendly test site for responsible pet owners north of Ponce Inlet is a good idea.
In my view, well-maintained dog beaches are a fun and proven amenity in other areas of Florida – and we desperately need new and innovative programs that enhance our area’s ‘livability and attractiveness’ for residents and visitors.
Angel Daytona Beach City Commissioner Ken Strickland
“It’s easy to stand with the crowd. It takes courage to stand alone.”
–Mahatma Gandhi
When watching the sausage being made, or perusing what passes for the news of the day, I am always intrigued by those lopsided votes of local councils and commissions that set public policy – or authorize the zoning changes that usher in another development – and I find it interesting to examine the machinations that result in the “yeas and nays” that shape our lives and livelihoods.
I’m not talking about those lockstep voting blocs of likeminded stooges, each indebted to the same wealthy insiders and desperately committed to preserving the status quo – that’s as dull and uninspiring as the compromised politicians who engage in it…
But I have immense respect for elected servant-leaders who stand defiantly alone and vote their conscience – representing the needs of his or her constituents with courage – fighting against political expediency, taking the unpopular position, and doing that which is right.
From the most pressing issues of our time to the mundane matters of governance, there are many reasons why political courage is so rare, yet dissent and debate is essential to our democracy.
Earlier this week, we learned that Encompass Health Corporation, the largest owner and operator of rehabilitation hospitals in the nation, is the latest beneficiary of the Halifax area’s unique brand of corporate welfare – a recurrent shim-sham that showers tax breaks and other “economic incentives” on massive corporations for little (if anything) in return – beyond the hollow promise of ‘high-paying jobs.’
In the private sector, success requires understanding the art of negotiation – when to give and when to take – the ability to think strategically, avoid potential pitfalls, leverage advantages, craft mutually beneficial outcomes, and most important, spend money only when there is an identified return on investment.
Unfortunately, that dynamic is different in the public sector, where playing fast and loose with other people’s money does not require a lot of thought – like spending millions of tax dollars by placing appropriations on an uncontested “consent agenda,” or picking winners and losers by skewing the marketplace with publicly funded props.
With the Halifax area experiencing explosive population growth – the region is increasingly attractive to businesses and service providers seeking to take advantage of this rapidly expanding market.
Rather than capitalize on this unique point in our history, our ‘powers that be’ seem pathologically stuck on stupid – unable to escape the “that’s the way we’ve always done it” mindset – refusing to seize the initiative and negotiate from this fleeting position of strength.
For instance, rather than demand concessions from Amazon – the largest e-commerce retailer in the known universe – Daytona Beach officials allowed them to build a fulfillment center at the desirable nexus of I-4 and I-95 immediately adjacent to an airport, then dutifully handed over $4 million in economic incentives, despite the anticipated impacts on our already overstressed streets, roadways, and claustrophobic residents.
In exchange, area residents were promised $15 an hour scutwork…
Now, in an informative article by Eileen Zaffiro-Kean writing in The Daytona Beach News-Journal, we learn that Encompass Health – who plans to construct a 50-bed inpatient rehabilitation center at the increasingly crowded intersection of Williamson Boulevard and Strickland Range Road – will “…receive city property tax breaks of up to $300,000 per year during its first five years of operation,” for a total of $1.5 million in relief.
What’s the ROI?
Well, it appears Encompass Health simply agreed to staff the place…
If you live here on Florida’s “Fun Coast” you may find this hard to believe – but there are places in this country who know their worth.
In counties and municipalities across the nation that value their quality of life and civic aesthetics, those who are elected to represent the interests of their neighbor’s demand concessions from industry and commerce seeking to relocate to their community.
The result is a healthy competition of civic enhancements beyond a promise of jobs (those are a given) – a mitigating investment by those corporations seeking to take advantage of things like location, a quality workforce, location, stable governance, location, successful schools, location, civic amenities, and location.
This includes negotiating transportation and utilities improvements beyond the bare minimum required by proportionate-share agreements, parks, and recreational amenities, providing workforce housing opportunities, offering naming rights for athletic and civic facilities, philanthropic investment in the arts, and other true public/private partnerships that enrich the culture of a community.
Most important, by putting local taxpayers over out-of-state corporations, communities who know their inherent worth establish a level playing field, get government out of the marketplace, and treat all businesses – large and small – with fairness.
According to the News-Journal report on Encompass Health, “The average annual salary for the (ultimately 98) full-time employees must also remain at or above $65,000.
If all of those goals are met, Encompass will get 100% of its city property taxes reimbursed in the first and second years, 75% in the third and fourth years, and 50% in the fifth year.
Construction is expected to start in about four or five months, and it’s required to be complete by Dec. 31, 2025. It’s anticipated the first city property tax grant will be paid in 2027.”
For the record, the annual basic cost of living for a family of four in Volusia County is $56,040…
During the meeting, the intrepid civic activist Anne Ruby asked Daytona Beach officials to consider the planned median income of Encompass employees as the inflated salaries of a few top earners can “…mask low wages among many workers on the bottom of the company pay scale when an average is used.”
Of course, “Jeff Brown, the city’s director of Economic and Strategic Opportunities, told commissioners that even if the company’s top two earners were removed from the calculation, the average would still be above $65,000 for the remaining employees. He said the majority of workers would also earn more than $65,000 per year.”
It appears that Ms. Ruby’s sound logic rang true with Daytona Beach City Commissioner Ken Strickland, who, in an abundance of caution, asked his colleagues to consider continuing the matter until salary figures could be better analyzed to make sure taxpayers are getting the most for their sizeable investment.
Nah.
The majority of the City Commission wanted to press forward. Independent thought or further review be damned…
Ultimately, Commissioner Strickland stood alone for that which he thought was right and cast the lone “No” vote.
Good for him.
Quote of the Week
“When Tomoka Oaks was built 60 years ago, the quiet roads were not built for 300 more homes, but we are to believe that this short road measuring 450 feet leading out of Tomoka Oaks will handle approximately 600 more cars.
Escondido Condos’ residents also exit onto this short road to travel the short distance to get to Nova Road. They will be hard-pressed to work their way onto the road if residential development is allowed in the middle of Tomoka Oaks.
Residents in Tomoka Oaks North Condos and Talaquah will find it more difficult to directly pull out onto Nova.
The Trails will have many more cars coming through their development that do not want to wait in line on a 450-foot road to get onto Nova. The Trails has peaceful winding roads that were not meant for additional traffic.
The mayor speaks of finding “ways to implement innovative traffic management technologies.”
Who needs experts? Anyone living in one of the five developments that will be affected by 2,774 additional daily car trips can tell you. The quality of life, depreciation of properties, threat to the species of animals living on the land, challenge for emergency vehicles to enter and exit Tomoka Oaks and Escondido Condos, burden on hospitals and impact on the Tomoka River — which is currently on the impaired water list — are only a handful of reasons why this proposed residential development in the middle of a development is a preposterous and unviable idea.”
–Darla Widnall, Ormond Beach, Letters to the Editor, The Ormond Beach Observer, “Don’t approve the Tomoka Oaks golf course development,” Monday, June 26, 2023
And Another Thing!
“Two development proposals located just outside of the DeLand city limits are moving forward despite public concerns following recent Volusia County Council votes.
The developments required two rezonings and a Comprehensive Plan change.”
–Journalist Sheldon Gardner, writing in The Daytona Beach News-Journal, “County Council approves 2 new developments in West Volusia despite pushback,” Monday, June 26, 2023
In the not-too-distant future, this headline – and the scores like it that routinely appear in now neutered “newspapers” across Florida – will serve as the sad epitaph for the Sunshine State.
“Despite public concerns…”
In my view, this political gaslighting – and resultant loss of public confidence in our ability to influence local governance – is the foul curse of sleazebag politicians who have sold their political souls to the highest bidder, wealthy insiders who learned early the power of Florida’s legal quid pro quo campaign finance system.
This “arrangement” is something many fed-up Floridians have dubbed “corruption in plain sight” – a sleazy pact marked by massive campaign contributions from multiple corporate entities owned by the same person, elaborate “gifts,” private jet travel, underwriting luncheons and “galas,” and funding the many perquisites of high office that come with an expected (and lucrative) return on investment.
Invariably, this Faustian bargain provides another bite at the apple for those elected officials who play the game – something not limited to one political party or the other…
Trust me. Neither the compromised politicians, nor the well-heeled insiders who own them, give two-shits about your perspective – or the public’s perception of morality and ethics.
After what we read in the Washington Post this week – overdue revelations that our High Panjandrum of Political Power, Mori Hosseini, swings a lot of weight on this sandy spit of land – it is now clear those quaint notions of honor and decency in public service no longer matter here in the biggest whorehouse in the world…
In my view, nothing has a more deleterious effect on the public trust than the sinister disease of cronyism, insider access, and the ensuing backroom deals that are routinely sprung – ambush-style – on an unsuspecting constituency.
All while what passes for “public participation” in government is increasingly pushed off-the-agenda – out of sight, and out of mind. Now, you and I have no influence on public policy, zoning changes, or expenditures – as our serious concerns are frustratingly ignored in favor of paying customers…
In turn, We, The Little People are shocked as our elected officials point fingers at each other and insinuate criminal allegations or spew gossipy accusations in scintillating snippets (devoid of substantive facts) from the dais, fueling more speculation and political turbidity.
Sound familiar Deltona?
I believe in the adage, ‘where there’s smoke, there’s fire’ – and Volusia County is beginning to look like a conflagration of biblical proportions.
In my view, it is time for concerned residents to demand that anyone – inside government or out – who believes they have credible evidence of unethical or illegal behavior to report their suspicions to those state and federal agencies charged with protecting the public trust.
Then, it is incumbent on law enforcement and ethics officials to aggressively investigate credible allegations of official misconduct, sweetheart deals, and quid pro quo arrangements to ensure the integrity and basic fairness of our system of governance.
The health of our democracy demands it.
That’s all for me. Have a great weekend, y’all!










