Hi, kids!
It’s time once again to turn a jaundiced eye toward the news and newsmakers of the day who, in my cynical opinion, either contributed to our quality of life or detracted from it in some significant way…
The Volusia Knights of the Roundtable – Another Bite at a Rotten Apple
“Don’t look now – but here it comes again…
And by “it” I mean the macabre spectacle of Volusia’s half-cent sales tax money grab slowly clawing its way out of the mass grave of bad ideas after voters drove a stake through its greedy heart in 2019.
Unfortunately, this comes as no surprise to those cynical observers of Volusia County politics who understand that no tax increase is ever dead – just lying in wait for its next rehashed opportunity to suck more blood out of this exsanguinated turnip.”
–Barker’s View, “Here it comes again…,” November 28, 2021
During a panel discussion at the West Volusia State of the Region event last month, DeBary Mayor Karen Chasez “dropped the bombshell” that a “committee” of elected officials are considering resurrecting Volusia’s half-cent sales tax increase – this time camouflaged as a “stormwater and flooding” solution…
You read that right.
Reporter Al Everson laid out the latest money grab in the West Volusia Beacon last week:
“There is a move afoot to put a half-cent sales tax on the 2026 ballot, but it has nothing to do with roads. It has to do with stormwater, because we believe that that is the issue that is the most pressing issue on most residents’ minds. However, a lot has been learned since the effort the other year [2019], which was defeated by the residents.”
According to the report, “Chasez recalled the 2019 referendum on the half-cent infrastructure sales tax, which was a single-issue voting event that used a mail-in ballot. The result of the issue election was clear: a decisive majority of the electorate said, “No thank you.”
Asked who specifically is talking about resurrecting the proposed add-on sales tax, Chasez said a subcommittee on flooding and stormwater by the Elected Officials Roundtable — an informal group of elected municipal leaders that meets monthly, and formed to replace the now-defunct Volusia Council of Governments — has talked about the tax as a means of dealing with drainage woes.”
Here we go again…

For the uninitiated, The Volusia Knights of the Roundtable is a political insulation committee where local mayors, managers, county officials and hangers-on cobble together the groundwork for significant public policy decisions without any external input or questions.
The exclusive club (which meets at the Daytona “International” Airport while you are at work) is devoted to groupthink, shielding themselves behind the cowardly notion “If everyone is thinking alike, then we can’t be individually criticized.” A closed klatch where political insiders can insinuate “suggestions” into the process without any legitimate public challenge.
In my view, it represents a ‘pseudo-government,’ the antithesis of the open and honest debate of ideas and citizen participation.
Each time this greed-crazed idea of saddling every man, woman, and child in Volusia County with another tax increase is revived, it has been shot down by wary taxpayers who see – time-and-again – what happens when we give that monstrous bureaucracy in DeLand access to more of our hard-earned money…
In each case, the take is tied to the gross incompetence and lack of planning that led to insufficient transportation and utilities infrastructure across Volusia County – coupled with the strategic foot-dragging that permitted massive overdevelopment without concurrency – punishing us with inaction on the consequences until we acquiesce to their demands.
This time, it appears these half-brights are lashing the increase to “flooding and stormwater” – playing on the panic of residents desperate for relief from development-induced flooding.
When the sales tax increase was forced to a vote in 2019, taxpayers were still reeling from a damning 2016 external study that found Volusia County officials had not increased impact fees on their influential benefactors in the development community for 15-years.
In the lurid scandal that ensued, we discovered the shocking truth that county officials had intentionally hidden the study from the public – including its core recommendation of “…fees almost three times higher in some categories and a change to a county ordinance the consultants deemed overly generous to developers.”
With the walls closing in, Clay Ervin, Volusia’s director of Growth and Resource Mismanagement, blatantly lied like a cheap rug in front of God and everyone – forever cementing his professional reputation as a cheap fixer for developers – when he pathetically claimed the report was a “draft” that “we felt was incorrect.”
Now, we are paying for Ervin’s sins – and his ineptitude…
Although Ervin kept his job by proving his worth as a malleable stooge, willing to obscure and conceal the truth when the chips are down – former County Manager Jim Dineen ultimately did not survive the fallout – but the ugly fiasco proved to residents that Volusia County government cannot be trusted.
When the tax increase was resuscitated from the ash heap of bad ideas in 2019 – a horribly bungled initiative spearheaded by the mysterious Volusia CEO Business Alliance, an elite galère of millionaires who seem to think they know what is best for us rabble outside their gilded tower of power – it became apparent those wealthy insiders ham-handedly plotted the worst possible strategy for selling a sales tax increase to an already overburdened constituency.
In my view, when that iteration of the half-cent tax grab went down in flames, it was a resounding indictment of those gutless politicians who ignored their best instincts and succumbed to the slimy motivations of a few well-heeled insiders with a profit motive, selling out their neighbors for the promise of a few crumbs of a much larger pie.
They destroyed the public’s trust in the process.
Unfortunately, our ‘powers that be’ never learn from previous mistakes – they just repackage them with a bigger bow…
What’s changed?
In my view, there is a fundamental cruelty in a government – so irretrievably detached from those it exists to serve – that essential infrastructure is withheld, low-impact solutions strategically slow walked, and the resultant damage and fear used to leverage another shameless money grab.
Add to that the county’s construction of multi-million-dollar Taj Mahal public facilities, routine pay increases for grossly overpaid senior administrators, millions in corporate welfare giveaways, layers of “planning and administration” that siphon federal grant funds to the bureaucracy, the arrogant dismissal of our concerns, calculated procrastination, the lack of citizen input in policy decisions, routine gaslighting by elected and appointed officials, and you begin to see they are waiting us out.
In coming weeks, residents will be reminded of what happened the last time we voted to tax ourselves when the Volusia County Council approves the gross misuse of Volusia Forever and ECHO funds to construct Councilman Don Dempsey’s pet motorcross facility on 356-acres of cow pasture we purchased off State Road 44 for $4.62 million in tax generated conservation and passive outdoor recreation funds…
Never vote to levy another tax on your family.
Instead, demand that our elected representatives begin hacking the thick rind of fat off that bloated hog and learn to live within their already excessive means.
Volusia County government does not need more of our hard-earned money.
With an obscene annual budget now exceeding $1.3 billion (read that again), it is clear Volusia County government now exists to feed and expand the bureaucracy. In my view, waterlogged residents should not be expected to give the same compromised dullards who got us into this intractable mess more of our money with the expectation of a different result.
Volusia County Council of Cowards – The Sick Joke of Flood Mitigation
As I write this, outside my window at Barker’s View HQ a steady rain is falling.
It’s welcome relief.
The first appreciable precipitation in weeks and a much-needed respite from the extended drought that has resulted in extremely dry conditions affecting everything from the increased threat of wildfires to air quality.
Unfortunately, many Volusia County residents are suffering from Ombrophobia – an intense fear of rain – a civic anxiety disorder stemming from our collective experience with development-induced flooding.
For damn good reason…
You don’t have to be a hydrologist to understand that development-induced flooding is the result of piss-poor planning that permits development patterns which effect the gravitational flow of water. Due in part to “fill and build” construction – including the proliferation of impervious surfaces that alter the natural drainage, retention, and percolation of stormwater – these impacts on natural processes increase the damaging effects of runoff, making once dry areas now prone to flooding.

In response, anxious residents who have had their lives upended by repeat inundations have packed government meetings across Volusia and Flagler Counties demanding mitigation efforts – to include temporary building moratoriums – to allow infrastructure to catch up with current demand.
Dream on, you waterlogged rubes…
Last week, Volusia County Councilman Danny “Gaslight” Robins let soggy property owners know that reducing development-induced flooding is no longer the imperative we were promised it would be.
Now, the choice has been left to the discretion of profit-driven developers who have been gifted the lucrative option of implementing low-impact strategies, or not.
How is that possible?
Well, in a county known nationwide for widespread flooding (and transactional politics) – where government is actively spending public funds to purchase homes that are subject to repeat inundation – the compromised Mr. Robins recently said he is “trying not to add bureaucracy and more red tape,” (for his cronies) as he voted to make low-impact development practices voluntary…
In Danny’s world, even the thought of regulating factors that contribute to widespread flooding should be avoided if they hinder the ability of his political benefactors to haul millions-of-dollars out of once pristine recharge areas.
In the face of unprecedented suffering, last week those rent-a-representatives on the Volusia County Council concluded by unanimous vote that not only should the most flood prone county in Florida make best practices optional – but those soulless shills also agreed to provide lucrative incentives for their puppeteers in the development community who chose to apply accepted industry standards to projects.
In perhaps the most profoundly stupid (and telling) statement ever uttered from the dais of power in DeLand, Councilman Robins said, “If there was data that would show mandatory LID practices would solve the county’s flooding concerns, Robins said “there wouldn’t be any question up here.”
“We have to pay attention to the data and the facts, and I think it’s very important,” he said. “We’ve been down this road several times and I’m ready to vote.”
To their credit, Robins’ preposterous hoaxing was too much for the Ormond Beach Observer to accept, and the newspaper countered his perverse lie with an explanation of low-impact development strategies:
“According to the United States Environmental Protection Agency, a holistic implementation of LID — which includes standards to preserve natural drainage processes or mimic them for replacement — “reduces the volume and speed of stormwater runoff and decreases costly flooding and property damage” as well as help retain more rainfall onsite.”
Rather than mandate that developers incorporate best practices to limit flooding and protect existing residents, instead our ‘powers that be’ opted for a nonsensical “…flexible and voluntary process for implementing LID and green stormwater infrastructure standards with incentives.”
Now, if a developer elects to follow what should be mandatory LID best practices, they will be eligible to choose from a Chinese menu of lucrative “incentives” in the form of more environmental impacts, to include higher density, increased building height, reduction in tree replacement requirements, and reduced building permit and land use development fees.
For simply doing the right thing by existing residents?
Think about it: They want my family and yours to pay a higher sales tax on goods and services to address “stormwater and flooding” – while making flood mitigation voluntary for their campaign contributors in the real estate development industry?
Bullshit.
Good luck, my fellow ombrophobes.
With the Atlantic Hurricane Season two-weeks away, something tells me luck is all we have…
Daytona Beach Convention & Visitors Bureau – “Lies, Damned lies, and Statistics“
Perhaps it’s just my skeptical nature, but I always questioned the dubious numbers coming out of our ossified hospitality apparatus. Horribly inflated annual visitor counts that routinely reported that the Daytona Beach Resort Area was attracting nearly a million visitors a month.
That didn’t seem possible.
Shockingly, it now appears those “statistics” were little more than a wild-ass guess…
According to a report by Jim Abbott writing in The Daytona Beach News-Journal last week, “Volusia County attracted 4.5 million visitors in 2024, a figure that’s down more than 50% from the 10.1 million reported in 2023, according to figures from the Daytona Beach Area Convention & Visitors Bureau.
While that appears to be a startling decline, the reality is that the difference is due to new methodology used by Downs & St. Germain Research, a Tallahassee-based tourism market research firm now calculating the annual totals, said Lori Campbell Baker, executive director of the Daytona Beach Area CVB.”
The reality is somebody told a whopper. For decades…
In my view, this isn’t just another example of the toxic optimism that has destroyed the public trust in government and tax-supported agencies – it appears to be a complete fabrication.
Accurate visitor analysis is important for economic development purposes, investor research, business starts, grant funds, entrepreneurial due diligence, the allocation of bed taxes, staffing decisions, marketing efforts, etc.

Only in the wacky world of Halifax area tourism would a decline of over 50% in the estimated number of visitors – and the resultant complete loss of credibility – be considered a positive. Yet, the CVB found a way to put a happy face on it with a few pithy talking points:
“Although the year-over-year raw visitor estimates differ widely, Baker praised the Tallahassee firm for its overview of the broad impact of tourism on a destination.
“For us, what we do in terms of bringing folks into the community is really all about what they do for our community,” Baker told a crowd of hoteliers, tourism leaders and county officials. “How much are they spending in our local businesses? How are they leaving this community better than when they arrived?”
So, why the enormous disparity between what we were sold for decades and the reality as reported by our new pollster?
According to the report, the updated visitor total includes only those who intentionally spent time in the area, not “pass-through travelers.” I assume that refers to living/breathing tourists who actually rented a room and stayed a spell, as opposed to sitting on the shoulder of I-95 counting passing cars…
Now, the CVB and those hospitality dinosaurs who have controlled our tourism industry for decades are wiping egg off their face and covering their tracks – jabbering about how this massive discrepancy in visitor estimates could have occurred (for years) – while spewing astronomical numbers touting the impact of the tourism industry on our local economy.
I don’t believe a word of it.
Given the Florida Legislature’s nascent push to redirect tourist development taxes – a move that would eliminate redundant Tourist Development Councils – those who told us things were better than they actually were (as we watched while the repeat recommendations of consultants were ignored as the core tourist product deteriorated into blight and dilapidation) are sounding the klaxon that their bed tax teat may be running dry.
According to the News-Journal, “At the same time, the tourism impact of international trade wars with allies such as Canada and efforts by the Florida legislature to re-direct tourist development tax funds require continued vigilance, said Bob Davis, president and CEO of the Lodging & Hospitality Association of Volusia County.
“We have a very, very serious challenge,” Davis said, quoting New York Yankees legend Yogi Berra that “it ain’t over until it’s over. The Florida legislature wants to steal our precious bed tax. We all must persevere.”
In my view, the true challenge faced by Mr. Davis and his cohorts at the CVB is how to overcome the complete lack of confidence that now permeates every data package coming out of our compromised hospitality apparatus at a time when the Daytona Beach Resort Area is struggling desperately for market relevance.
Quote of the Week
“The Bunnell planning board on Tuesday approved the comprehensive plan change and rezoning of nearly 1,900 acres from agriculture to industrial, on land stretching from U.S. 1 to County Road 304. It is the single-largest rezoning of the kind in the city’s or county’s history and would reshape the character of both as surely as would the massive 8,000-home residential development proposed for west of the city.
Yet the planning board recommended approval on a pair of 3-1 votes without a single question, inquiry or comment.
The changes, which must be ratified by the city commission, are raising fears among neighboring residents that heavy industrial uses–like the fuel farm Palm Coast and Ormond Beach rejected–will be built there. The sudden proposal also has residents perplexed, and at times furious, over the breadth of the request and the speed of the process, with little vetting, no workshop, and limited public notice.
Planning Board member Lynn Lafferty is one of the owners of the land. She recused herself from Tuesday’s votes but not the meeting, though her silence merely echoed that of her colleagues on the board. It was an inexplicable display of collective muteness, if not irresponsibility, raising questions about what board members know and are not saying.
–Editor Pierre Tristam, writing in FlaglerLive.com, “Without a Single Question, Bunnell Board Approves Rezoning of Nearly 1,900 Acres to Industrial, Outraging Residents,” Thursday, May 8, 2025
On Monday, to their credit, the Bunnell City Commission agreed to table further discussion of the rezoning request after residents turned out to protest a move that will fundamentally change their lives forever.

If approved, the rezoning would amend the future land use map from “agriculture” to “agriculture community industrial” for around 459 acres, and change approximately 1,383 acres near US-1 and County Road 304 to “L-2, heavy industrial” – a rezoning many believe paves the way for the orphaned plan to put a 20-million-gallon petroleum terminal in the area…
According to an informative report by Spectrum News 13’s Devin Martin:
“We do not want a huge, big landfill coming in our backyard,” Lila Pontius, who lives 300 feet away from the proposed rezoning plan, said. “What is that going to do to our water? What is that going to do to the animals? It will change everything that we know of.”
In response, Bunnell officials said they would not move forward with the first reading of the proposal on May 28, tabling it for the time being.
Joe Parsons, community development director for city, reiterated, though, that there are currently no plans for a development on the land.
“The application in question is for rezoning only,” Parsons said. “There is no use that has been applied for or being proposed in conjunction with this application at this time.”
Bullshit.
There’s a reason Planning board member Lafferty and her fellow property owners off 304 are seeking a rezoning to heavy industrial, and something tells me “Community Development” Director Joe Parsons knows that…
This one bears watching, folks.
And Another Thing!
A few years back, a smart friend of mine sent a clipping from the Tallahassee Democrat published in 1972, which contained the glaring warning “Halt Florida’s Chaotic Growth, Experts Plead.”
That chilling headline by Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Mike Toner of the Miami Herald News Service, was followed by an eerily prophetic report explaining why “Florida’s growth is outstripping the efforts to plan properly for it, and, in some parts of the state, growth should stop until planning can catch up…”
In his article, Mr. Toner quoted the recommendation of two groups with competing interests – the American Institute of Architects and Florida Defenders of the Environment – who collaborated on a list of “temporary solutions,” which included:
“A halt to all major transportation programs, especially I-95 and I-75 in south Florida and I-10 in north Florida, while a comprehensive study of their environmental impact is made,” and “…a moratorium be placed on areas “of new and potential growth” where the growth is certain to affect natural resources…”
Wow. Fifty-three years ago.

Now, the mere mention of the “M word” by a sitting elected official results in their personal and professional destruction. A public humiliation orchestrated by the development community and executed tag-team style by their compromised “colleagues.”
A political castration that ensures they can never threaten the lucrative status quo again.
That conformity is why, when given the opportunity to do the right thing and demand mandatory development standards to protect our environment and mitigate flooding, they fold like the cheap tools they are…
In my view, there remains one fundamental democratic mechanism which, if exercised broadly, will allow waterlogged residents to prevail over the political insiders who seem intent on paving every square inch of our sensitive environment for personal enrichment:
It is the ultimate power of the ballot box.
With next year’s Volusia County Council contests beginning to take shape, some of our claustrophobic neighbors are beginning to announce their candidacy. Fortunately, some good people have already announced they are ready to put it all on the line to affect positive change.
It appears an increasing number of “Fun Coast” residents are mad as hell, and aren’t going to take it anymore…
Earlier this week, some 80 protestors waving “Slow the Growth” and “No More Greed” signs appeared at the New Smyrna Beach City Commission meeting to oppose the massive Deering Park Innovation Center Planned Unit Development.
Although commissioners Jason McGuirk, Valli Perrine, Brian Ashley and Mayor Fred Cleveland ignored the concerns of their constituents and voted to approve the PUD rezoning, Vice Mayor Lisa Martin voted against a project that will change the character and culture of the community in perpetuity.
Something tells me the “Deering Park Four” will ultimately pay a hefty political price for their acquiescence…
In truth, losing power and influence is the only thing that strikes fear in these self-serving shills on councils and commissions across the region who are actively shitting on our quality of life – wasting precious time with insulting diversions like incentivizing voluntary low-impact development practices – and approving additional development in the most flood prone county in Florida.
As rainclouds build on the horizon…
That’s all for me. Welcome to Rockville, y’all!
Exactly… wish you would do an extensive VIEW
LikeLike
While I enjoy your comments, I do not think you understand the requirements of elected official decision making under Quasi Judicial procedures. The recent vote in NSB was exactly that and while there was a large crowd there voicing opposition, they did not comply with the evidentiary requirements in their comments. Some were not even city residents and a few refused to identify themselves during the public comments section as required under NSB procedure. As explained at the beginning of the meeting, by the city attorney, the five members of the commission could only base their decision on substantive and factual evidence, not emotion, hearsay, or un substantiated accusations. For example the fact a parcel flooded during the last hurricane has no evidentiary value as there is no factual relationship between that fact and the proposed project. I am not a developer, lawyer or otherwise invested in this project other than as a citizen, and like you a retired cop, one who has attended every meeting and reviewed all of the documentation provided. I have never seen many of these people at those prior meetings. IN addition, the leader of this group (Slow the Growth Volusia) is running for election to the Volusia County Council; you can add the pieces to that. No matter how you come down on the question of growth, chanting, sign waving, etc., does not get it under quasi judicial rules.
But as I said, keep up the work as I enjoy your takes on the county.
NOTE: somehow the first attempt to comment failed.
LikeLike
I already pay a storm water assessment on my tax bill. looks like we will fight this sales tax increase. (Again)
LikeLike
Good job this week Mark.Lets start off with tourism.Daytona has Rockville only brings the finest people who pick pockets and steal phones.Than we have Bike Week.DBNJ today had what to do in Ormond Beach this weekend.A beer festival at the Casements and a 2 hour bus tour of Ormond Beach for $30 a person.What a thrill.Lets talk builders and floods.Drive down to Plantation Oaks where all the trees are cut down to build homes then go to the end where you have the Trails.Even during the drought there is water on the east side of the road up to the road.Signs near Hailifax Plantation saying beware of flooding waters ahead as more homes are being built just west of the trails over there and then we have Avalon .We also had a boil water order for Daytona for almost a week.The water treatment plant is old off of LPGA.No people coming for vacation here because there is nothing to do.We are taking our vacation to Ft Lauderdale by the sea,Naples and then Tampa and come home .Will pass on Disney and Universal.Have a great week all.
LikeLike
Let’s remember its not just local leaders who lack courage to raise impact fees. Our state legislature and governor capped how much impact fees can go up, and put in place an expensive and convoluted process a city has to go through to justify it. Bottom line, the governor is good with growth and with the current residents paying part of the price instead of all of it being paid by those who build here. Port Orange raised their impact fees by the maximum allowed a few short years ago, and I remember the mayor saying it was still insufficient, but it was the most Florida Law would allow. Thanks Gov Desanctimonious! And your developer friend MH and his massive political donation war chest!
LikeLike
Are the local politicians the only guilty ones? The State laws make it very hard to stop development unless there is very strong evidence that a development would cause serious harm personally or financially. Maybe we should be working to change those laws.
LikeLike