Earlier this week, the faux conservationists of the Volusia County Council joined with members of our state legislative delegation for a meeting of their exclusive mutual admiration society to congratulate each other’s performance in wheedling a paltry $450,000 – split between the City of Oak Hill and Volusia County – ostensibly for restoration of the imperiled Indian River Lagoon.
The introductions of the “honorables” went on for over ten minutes. . .
To their credit, council members Heather Post, The Very Reverend Fred Lowry and Barb Girtman were conspicuously absent from the over-the-top pageant of political vainglory.
Congressman Michael Waltz was in attendance to tout a recent committee vote which moves his amendment adding the Indian River Lagoon to the South Florida Coastal Clean Waters Act. If approved, Waltz’ amendment would include northern portions of the lagoon in a convoluted multi-year “assessment” of algae blooms that have already killed thousands of acres of sea grasses, fish and wildlife.
By convoluted, I mean the proposed assessment protocol would include a 540-day deadline for an interim study, a two-year deadline for completion of an “action plan” to drive federal funding and a three-year deadline for final assessment.
Considering that many South Florida waterways are being turned into a fetid guacamole by what everyone (except, apparently, our state and federal government) attributes to nutrient runoff – and the fact any child with an aquarium understands the nitrogen cycle – it’s nice to see that those charged with protecting our environment are finally getting around to “assessing” the situation. . .
(I happen to like freshman Congressman Waltz – he’s doing good work – but perhaps the next time he finds himself in a room full of fawning local politicians – with no ‘regular Joe’s’ in attendance – perhaps that should be a clue to take his leave – because he’s being used as a prop. . .)
The always arrogant Volusia County Councilwoman Deb Denys – who also chairs the Indian River Lagoon Council – served as master of ceremonies for this cheap photo opportunity that included sitting politicians, appointed officials, entrenched bureaucrats and “water management” types.
During her seemingly endless self-congratulatory gabfest, Ms. Denys gushed, ad nauseum, about how hard our politicos have worked to bring state and federal dollars to Southeast Volusia – which will no doubt be distributed to various consultants, corporations, contractors and hangers-on. . .
These are the very assholes who have systematically approved rampant, out-of-control growth from Farmton to the Flagler County line – sprawl that continues to contribute to the abject destruction of our sensitive wetlands and estuaries – who continue to lie to us about their demonstrably bogus commitment to “clean water” as a gaudy political ploy.
The meeting turned into a crude cartoon when our doddering fool of a County Chair, Ed Kelley, who continues to deny scientific evidence of sea level rise – lest it slow the rapid destruction of our natural places by his greed-crazed political benefactors in the real estate development community – actually had the balls to be recognized in the same sentence with environmental funding. . .
This stomach-turning soiree was also attended by Senator Tom Wright and Representative David Santiago – who represent our compromised state legislature that recently gutted local land use regulations by neutering a citizens right to challenge the adverse impacts of development in their community.
The same legislature that has stood silent as tons of sewage sludge is dumped near the headwaters of the St. John’s River and beyond.
It seems like everyone-who-is-anyone in Volusia County politics was on-hand for the goofy check presentation ceremony – except those of us who pay for it all.
Why is that?
Frankly, it was nauseating to watch these eco-poseurs jockeying for position behind over-sized checks representing our money in a craven effort to convince us they care.
These preening phonies make me sick.
Don’t take my word for it – watch the video.
While the Indian River Lagoon Council has provided funding for some valuable studies, technical assessments and shoreline restoration projects – it also has a tendency toward self-centered spending that, in my view, has little direct effect on the myriad threats to the lagoon’s water quality.
Let’s take a look at a few of the way’s public funds and donations allocated for restoration and mitigation under the Indian River Lagoon National Estuaries Program (IRLNEP) have been spent in the past few years:
$50,000 to a corporate entity to assist the IRLNEP to “revise” the 2008 Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan.
$50,000 for “brand engagement” of the IRLNEP’s “One Community – One Voice” initiative. Apparently, an enigmatic marketing program designed to “. . .build upon the One Lagoon concept and succinctly articulate the activities and value proposition of the IRLNEP.” (Say what?)
$100,000 to a corporate entity for “technical support and data management.”
$80,000 to three “consultants” for technical grant-writing assistance for “stakeholders.”
$100,000 for “Brand Activation and Implementation,” which, according to the IRLNEP’s almost undecipherable summary, “Deliverables include 2 half-day enculturation sessions, production of a learner’s guide summarizing important IRL-focused topics, audio production of compelling, personal IRL stories for up to 50 stakeholders, creation of a One Voice web page to house archived audio/photo/video experiences.”
(You just know anytime there’s an “enculturation” session it’s going to be expensive. . .)
All this on top of the IRLNEP’s estimated $350,000 annual cost for salaries and benefits, $20,000 for facilities expenses, $30,000 in administrative expenses and $110,000 for legal, accounting, auditing and personnel services. . .
While the lagoon continues to suffocate.
While these shitheels are slapping each other on the back, positioning themselves for even “higher office,” posing behind expensive marketing materials paid for with our tax dollars and donations – the bulldozers and industrial pumps continue to roar – and we inch ever closer to drinking our own reclaimed sewage in the name of progress. . .
Screw these political opportunists.
The proof of how much this wholly compromised gaggle of half-wits and others like them truly care about our environment is evident in the rapid decline of our springs, the horrific lesions appearing on fish, the toxic algal blooms that are slowly strangling our rivers and estuaries, the wholesale destruction of our aquifer recharge areas, kowtowing to political donors from big agriculture and the slash-and-burn land clearing practices that are obliterating wetlands and wildlife habitat in exchange for more-more-more “theme” developments and strip malls.
This is exactly what it looks like when politicians lose the capacity for shame.
4 thoughts on “On Volusia: Eco-Poseurs on Parade”
Please forgive what may seem an oversimplification or naive take on all you bring to our attention – in a clear and unwavering, accurate detail about the snakes in our grass, hiding in plain sight.
Next is a run-on sentence. I apologize in advance.
Reading of and recognizing the volume of documented proof of public funds and property being intentionally diverted for purposes other than what our voters decide, our delicate environment requires, or basically for any purpose other than what it was designated for, by any elected or appointed official voting in favor of it, within our county and city governments, I have to wonder why it isnt a criminal offense?
Or at least meet the standard for impeachment for mismanagement/diversion/corruption of public funds and property?
Aren’t public, state and federal funds and properties protected from misappropriation/diversion in any manner?
And if our water management officials fail to protect this precious resource we are swiftly in danger of permanently destroying by allowing sewage dumping, chemical runnoff, and killing marine life and vegetation (again, well documented), why are they not facing criminal charges of intentional destruction of public resources, property and intentional pollution?
Accepting a seat and taking the oath as an elected or appointed official to “not cause harm” are more than just words – right?
What am I missing?
They declare success regardless of outcome. This is done to ensure a consistent revenue stream going forward and the SJRWMD, FWC, and DEP are all dirty in this shell game. They use septic and fertilizer to blame the public, but those are mostly just distractions from what is really going on.
The point, Claudia, is that it is not important what they do. It is important what they say. And they say they are going to make a difference.
You believe that, don’t you?
Although declared successful by the poseurs, dragline ditch restoration and oyster shell recycling are two projects doing more harm than good to the IRL.
Dragline ditch restoration releases tremendous amounts of latent insecticides back into the water column, killing countless amounts of marine invertebrates in the process and the oyster recycling projects likely introduced the invasive brown algae (Aureoumbra lagunensis) from Texas via the inadequate quarantine and decontamination of oyster shells from Texas. In addition, the closed bagging of these oyster shells is creating thousands of micro-environments similar to “ghost pots” which feed Aureoumbra lagunensis with a perpetual supply of NH4 by the cycle of death.