Hi, kids!

It’s time once again to turn a jaundiced eye toward the news and newsmakers of the day who, in my cynical opinion, either contributed to our quality of life or detracted from it in some significant way…

The City of Palm Coast – Lex Talionis…                         

Move over, Deltona.

There’s a new civic dumpster fire in the Metropolitan Statistical Area and it’s called the City of Palm Coast…

Embattled Palm Coast Mayor Mike Norris – whose term was intentionally upended the exact second he called for a building moratorium in the face of astronomically expensive utility upgrades required to keep pace with current needs – filed an emergency lawsuit on Monday seeking the removal of quasi-Council member and developer shill Charles Gambaro.

Many in the community believe Gambaro is a plant, a useful tool with strategic alliances with former Mayor/Realtor David Alfin and other influential development interests outside City Hall.   

In his legal action, Norris requests the court declare the District 4 seat vacant and remove Gambaro from office, claiming his October 2024 appointment violated the city charter by failing to put the seat up for election last November.  

According to The Daytona Beach News-Journal this week, “Palm Coast District 4 Councilmember Cathy Heighter resigned in August, and the council appointed Gambaro 3-1 (with only four members on the panel at that point) to replace her Oct. 1. Those in favor were previous Mayor David Alfin, previous Vice Mayor Ed Danko and previous Councilman Nick Klufas. All three were voted out in November. Theresa Carli Pontieri, the only one to retain her seat after the election, supported Darryl Boyer.

According to Norris’ complaint, the city charter would have required Gambaro’s appointment to expire after the Nov. 5 election. It is Norris’ position that the city “has continued to allow Gambaro to occupy the seat beyond the term authorized by the charter.”

Interestingly, Norris is represented by Attorney Anthony Sabatini, the perennial politician who served two terms in the Florida Legislature and is currently a member of the Lake County Commission. 

It appears Mr. Sabatini is making a cottage industry of extricating “Fun Coast” mayors from sticky political wickets (a lucrative niche, always in high demand), having recently received nearly $11,000 from the citizens of Deltona to represent Mayor Santiago Avila, Jr. against allegations he violated the city’s travel policy…

Although Norris has long-held that Gambaro’s appointment was invalid, it appears this week’s filing is an eye-for-an-eye – retaliation for Gambaro’s recent attack from the dais asking the council to request Gov. Ron DeSantis remove Norris from office after the council commissioned an “independent investigation” into allegations brought by Gambaro.

A subsequent kangaroo kourt (which anointed Norris’s confrontational “colleagues” judge, jury, and executioner) found Mayor Norris guilty of asking senior staff members to resign.  In turn, Norris was sentenced in absentia to a vote of no-confidence, a public censure, and set to be referred to the Florida Commission on Ethics for reasons that have never been fully explained…

Adding to the shitstorm, during a special meeting last week to discuss the results of the investigation, onlookers were shocked when Mayor Norris dropped a veiled allegation he had been “offered a quid pro quo” by someone listed as a witness in the investigation in exchange for his favorable vote on the 2025 comprehensive plan.

Whoa.

If true, that’s something that should interest the state’s ethics apparatus – and the Florida Department of Law Enforcement…     

According to a report by Sierra Williams writing in the Palm Coast Observer last week:

“The investigation – performed by Adam Brandon of the third-party firm Lawson Huck Gonzales, PLLC – encompasses 13 witness statements, including one from Norris, and three from individuals outside the city: former councilman Ed Danko, Jeff Douglas of Douglas Property & Development and Paul Rice, director of Real Estate Development with Raydient.

Before the discussion of the investigation, Norris passed the gavel over to Pontieri and called for an emergency closed-door City Council meeting to happen 24 hours after the end of the May 1 meeting to discuss four of the witness statements in the investigation. Norris said he was offered a “quid pro quo” by one of the witnesses if he were to allow the 2025 comprehensive plan to pass as is written.”

Disturbing.

Amidst the tut-tutting and consternation of Mr. Norris’ “colleagues,” on Tuesday it was decided the mayor would pursue the matter with law enforcement, working his way from the Flagler County Sheriff’s Office to FDLE and beyond as necessary, including the option of filing an ethics complaint of his own.

According to a report in the Palm Coast Observer on Wednesday, the Palm Coast City Council also agreed to send the investigation into Mayor Norris’ actions “…violating the Palm Coast City Charter to the Florida Ethics Commission, but with the witness statements sworn under oath,” along with a cover letter ensuring everyone knows the council passed a vote of no confidence… 

Wait. The council’s “investigator” failed to obtain sworn statements from witnesses at the time of their interview?  Allowing “witnesses” to say whatever they want without penalty of perjury?     

Whatever.

Apparently, no one who should at Palm Coast City Hall understands the role and function of the Florida Commission on Ethics – and it has nothing to do with sorting HR complaints and charter violations…

During a February meeting, Mayor Norris said, “I move that we table this Comprehensive Plan to a date uncertain.  I know the plan, and I don’t think that our city is ready for what’s coming with this Comprehensive Plan.”

Then, in March, Norris dropped the “M” word – calling for an indefinite building moratorium – and that’s when developers, and their shills inside City Hall, began to circle the wagons…   

At the time, Mayor Norris warned, “We’re not going to keep building on something that we can’t sustain and putting it on the back of our residents. They don’t deserve it. I don’t deserve it. Nobody in this room deserves it. So either the developers are going to start doing industrial growth to bring in jobs, offset our tax base, or we’re going to stop doing houses altogether. When I propose it I will say to a date uncertain. Now, I know I’m going to get pushback– ‘we can’t stop building, we can’t stop building.’ Well, if we don’t stop building, we’re going to be broke, and we’re going to force lifetime residents of Florida, Flagler County, to flee their homes, because they cannot afford to live in this state anymore. Plain and simple. Like I said, we are at an inflection point, and we need to fix it.”

In the view of many, that represents the moment things went horribly sideways for Mayor Mike Norris and the 63% of now disenfranchised Palm Coast voters demanding stability at City Hall and protection from rampant overdevelopment.

Make no mistake, none of this melodramatic backstabbing has anything to do with progressing the City of Palm Coast, recruiting a competent city manager, finding solutions to the crushing ramifications of overdevelopment and insufficient infrastructure, or setting a strategic vision for responsible growth based on sustainability and sound public policy.

It is about retribution and sending a clear message.

In my view, this internecine warfare is what happens when internal and external forces conspire to retain the very lucrative status quo at a time when development interests are seeking an obscene and irresponsible “westward expansion” into thousands of acres west of U.S.1 – something Mayor Norris has vehemently opposed based upon his distrust of developers.

On Tuesday, the final approval of the comprehensive plan was approved 4-1 – with Mayor Norris casting the lone dissenting vote…

Volusia County School Board v. City of DeBary – The Bullying Begins

“Your aggressive, dogmatic message is reprehensible. You pretend to be protecting the interests of your constituents,” wrote attorney Ted Doran. “Your actions belie the true focus of your self-serving financial greed. When the school is built, and you have long since left your position with the city, you will be remembered for having been on the wrong side of history…. You speak of a broken trust. It is you who will have broken trust with the community.”

–Attorney Ted Doran, representing the Volusia County School Board, as quoted by reporter Mark Harper writing in The Daytona Beach News-Journal, “Schools lawyer accuses DeBary officials of ‘self-serving financial greed’ in school fight,” Tuesday, May 6, 2025

In my view, few things are more nauseating than when a massive taxing authority – one with an obscene budget now exceeding $1.6 billion annually – uses our money to pay a vicious mouthpiece to intimidate, bully, and harass a smaller municipality for trying desperately to determine its own destiny.  

Is this really how the Volusia County School Board treats other elected officials with a sworn and fiduciary responsibility to their constituents? 

In my view, there is a difference between an aggressive attorney employing legal maneuvers and interpreting the law in a manner favorable to their client – and the use of cheap thuggery, name-calling, and baseless accusations of public corruption against duly elected city officials as a means of steamrolling them.  

So much for well-intentioned negotiation and compromise, eh? 

According to Mr. Harper’s informative report, “In April, the School Board voted 4-1 to spend $8.4 million on two parcels totaling 25 acres at the intersection of Spring Vista Drive and South Shell Road.

DeBary City Manager Carmen Rosamonda sent the school district a cease-and-desist letter on April 28 and held a press conference a few days later to warn the district that the city will fight to stop any school from being built there.

Doran’s letter, obtained through a public-records request on May 5, challenges DeBary’s contention that a school at the Spring Vista site violates its comprehensive plan and the 2007 interlocal agreement between the school board, DeBary, Volusia County and 15 other municipalities.”

According to reports, Doran says the obstinate District intends “to proceed with the development of the property as a school.” 

What I found interesting is why Superintendent Balgobin and her lapdogs on the School Board unleashed Mr. Doran now, authorizing a scorched earth antagonistic diatribe that does nothing to foster trust or establish lines of communication. 

Instead, they almost force a protracted and incredibly expensive lawsuit that benefits who?

Oh, yeah….   

For the uninitiated, Doran was “swapped out” with Aaron Wolfe as the School Board’s front facing attorney in 2022 after board members expressed dissatisfaction with his performance during long overdue evaluations.

At the time it was reported “the swap was decided by the firm rather than the school board,” and Mr. Doran’s law firm still serves as the School Board’s contracted legal counsel.  

Interestingly, in a September 2022 News-Journal article announcing the Doran switcheroo, it was reported that now School Board Chair Jamie Haynes – the hell-bent-for-leather driving force behind constructing the school in her hometown of DeBary – was quoted:

“Jamie Haynes gave Doran the lowest score on the evaluation, a 2 out of 19, citing communication and professionalism issues.

“I have been put in situations where I was threatened and then received a text trying to skew what was said and turn it into a different type of statement. I’ve had a family member that was texted and asked to set up a meeting (between Doran and Haynes),” she said, which she believes was inappropriate.”

So, has Chair Haynes agreed to overlook Mr. Doran’s previous “professionalism issues”? 

Has she developed a newfound trust in his communication style – or is it a case where desperate times call for desperate measures – and she needs his brash style to ramrod her legacy project?

I find it equally interesting that in 2024, the school board purchased some 48-acres east of U.S. 17-92 across from the SunRail station in DeBary, reportedly paying nearly $5 million ostensibly to locate a school on the site. 

As I understand it (and I’m not sure I do), it was later determined that it would cost up to $20 million to “dewater” the site and prepare it for construction – which raises another disturbing question:  Did anyone bother to complete a due diligence investigation prior to the purchase – or is the Volusia County School Board getting us into the speculative real estate game? 

More important: Why? 

Especially at a time we were told the District is $25.8 million in the red due to declining enrollment.

Cui bono?

As usual, more questions than answers emerge from Superintendent Balgobin’s Ivory Tower of Power in DeLand.  But perhaps deflecting those annoying details explains why Mr. Doran is putting so much dust in the air so early in the fray? 

Your guess is as good as mine… 

Regardless, with a legal strategy of counteraccusations and character assassination now in play, it appears there is little left to talk about between the City of DeBary and Volusia County District Schools – a stalemate that could eventually prove far more expensive for taxpayers caught in the middle.

Quote of the Week

“First Step Shelter representatives came before the Ormond Beach City Commission on Tuesday asking to continue their partnership, worried that the city was on the cusp of pulling its support for the homeless shelter.

City officials side-eyed each other on the dais. They’d never discussed pulling funding from the shelter, they said.

“I will say that there is strong evidence that our board appointee has misspoke on my position regarding the First Step Shelter,” Commissioner Travis Sargent said. “I support the First Step Shelter. I think they do an amazing job. Yes, we may not utilize it like we could, but look at our neighboring municipalities and how they’re utilizing it, and those are less people coming into our communities.”

–Managing Editor Jarleene Almenas, writing in the Ormond Beach Observer, “Ormond Beach says support for First Step Shelter remains unchanged,” Wednesday, May 7, 2025

In February 2024, former Ormond Beach Mayor-turned-State Representative Bill Partington sought a workshop to discuss strategies and ordinances to address the burgeoning homeless issue in his community. 

At that time, Mr. Partington was quoted in the Observer, “The request for a workshop comes after the city has received various complaints about the rise of homelessness and panhandling in Ormond Beach.

“We’ve been a part of First Step (Shelter) for years, since the beginning, and I don’t feel like we’ve gotten the value out of it just because we haven’t utilized it as much as we could,” Partington said.”

When former Mayor Partington said the quiet part aloud, it resulted in a full-court press – an urgent meeting of the minds – a collaborative effort involving legal departments from DeLand to Ormond Beach as officials worked collaboratively to find solutions to persistent issues the beleaguered First Step Shelter wasn’t capable of addressing.

During a February meeting, Commissioner Travis Sargent asked Mayor Leslie, as Ormond Beach’s representative to the First Step’s government board, “As our representative on the (First Step) board, I would like to know what your thoughts are on regarding the city to continue funding this.  Is the city making good use of this facility, and also, if we’re not using, how can we better use this facility?”

Given the fact Ormond Beach taxpayers are funding First Step to the tune of $85,000 annually, I thought Mr. Sargent’s questions were on point.

Then, last month, during discussions surrounding an absurd Teflon agreement crafted to protect embattled First Step Executive Director Victoria Fahlberg – in the face of expanding lawsuits from whistleblowers whose serious allegations of mismanagement remain unanswered – Mayor Leslie  “…warned that his city commissioners have concerns about the number of homeless people in Ormond Beach, and that voting on Fahlberg’s contract now could jeopardize the roughly $85,000 Ormond Beach contributes to the shelter each year as well as the money other local governments contribute.”

Now it appears that Mr. Sargent and his colleagues are no longer concerned about the number of homeless people in their community, or the fact that Volusia County has similar concerns with First Step that has resulted in decreasing contributions over the next five-years? 

Or is it simply another opportunity for Mayor Leslie’s determined detractors on the dais to embarrass and marginalize him during a public meeting?

Per usual, when Mayor Leslie explains his direct observations and concerns, he’s lambasted by his fellow elected officials, accused of speaking for the group, and ostracized in front of First Step representatives – who spend more time trotting around explaining how wonderful they are than alleviating the “homeless problem” in Volusia County?

As a life-long resident of Ormond Beach, I can tell you that homeless people are now ubiquitous in this often-presumptuous community – seen daily on main thoroughfares and side streets, mainland and beachside, along both East and West Granada Boulevard – unfortunates who have apparently fallen through the cracks or fail to meet “referral” requirements for the First Step Shelter (whatever those are…)

On a personal note, a few weeks ago while visiting friends in a quiet and long-established Ormond Beach neighborhood, I was approached by a gentleman who lived in a wooded area near Central Park; his possessions in a bindle on his back, who was in desperate need of socks to protect his blistered feet. 

Fortunately, we were blessed to help him with a few pairs.

As I watched that man dressing his feet on the shoulder of a residential street in Ormond Beach, I thought how far we have to go to meet the needs of those less fortunate, and the fallacy of putting all our eggs in First Step’s leaky basket…

In Ormond Beach, as elsewhere, it is no longer about finding lasting solutions to civic, social, and economic issues – but establishing political dominance – a cheap power grab by established politicians to keep newcomer Jason Leslie under thumb and in his place.  

While allowing the deliberately suppressed issues at First Step to fester until the next debacle becomes known…   

And Another Thing!  

Last week, I had a great conversation with Clayton Park, the highly respected business editor of The Daytona Beach News-Journal.  In my view, Clayton is a genuinely nice guy, a wonderful musician, and a bright spot in local journalism. 

We discussed some encouraging (and long-awaited) ‘signs and wonders’ that may foretell a possible Halifax area “renaissance” in the form of some specialty grocery stores and a luxury auto dealership.

During our talk, the astute Mr. Park reminded me that in February I made a snarky remark in the News-Journal about a group of celebrities opening an extravagant “Five Star” hotel in Daytona Beach – a place where, for years, we were told didn’t have the “demographic” to support a Trader Joe’s – let alone a South Beach-style luxury resort.

You know, a swanky place where wealthy stars and global jetsetters can pay $1,132 a room night (after winging in on an Avelo flight from Wilmington…) to spend a few days playing Skee Ball at what the Daytona Beach Convention and Visitors Bureau describes as “…the iconic Daytona Beach Boardwalk! Your family will be able to spend hours upon hours at this entertainment hub, all accompanied by the ocean breeze…” 

Just days after my quote appeared in the News-Journal, I ended up with free range, pasture-raised, organic egg on my funny face when cryptic plans were unveiled that a Trader Joe’s is coming to the Tomoka Town Center off Boomtown Boulevard in Daytona Beach.   

Hey, when I’m wrong, I’m wrong.

Since this blogsite’s inception, I have explained it as one man’s jaded view on the issues of the day – a cynical look at the news and newsmakers through a bloodshot eye – neither always right nor always wrong.  An alternative to the pathological optimism of our civic “leaders” who tell us one thing while we see something completely different with our own eyes… 

Regardless, my goal has always been to stimulate a larger discussion of the issues we collectively face, often using hyperbole and a sick sense of humor to make a point – because I learn from those who disagree with me – and nothing is more enlightening (or humbling) than when I am proven wrong.

Since I have always lacked the good sense to look the other way, I knew the first time I published Barker’s View it wasn’t going to make me any friends among the Halifax areas “rich and powerful” or those malleable marionettes their campaign contributions help elect to high office.   

Who cares.

Given the deteriorating conditions in many parts of our region – the abject blight and dilapidation that gave rise to eye-opening exposés like the News-Journal’s “Tarnished Jewel” series – it seemed cruel to remain silent while the hopes of residents and small business owners were taken advantage of.  

From the “panacea” projects from Ormond Beach south we were assured would fundamentally change the DNA of a slightly down-at-the-heels resort area suffering from a lack of maintenance, vision, and investment – to the myriad “game changers” – a term so ubiquitous it became a sick joke, even among our most enthusiastic cheerleaders, as the constant “rah-rah-sis-boom-bah” left many in our community disillusioned when the promises didn’t materialize.

Something that became more infuriating when our hard-earned tax dollars were used to underwrite the for-profit projects of our uber-wealthy insiders with a chip in the game…

Remember?  I do.

Extravagant gifts like the collective $40 million in “grants” and tax incentives we gave to One Daytona (where shoppers continue to pay a privately imposed “amenity fee” on all purchases), the $4.5 million granted to Tanger Outlets, the $4.5 million Tomoka Town Center received in “government funding,” the millions in tax credits, infrastructure, and incentives taxpayers gifted to Brown & Brown to build their headquarters on Beach Street (billed as a “gamechanger on steroids” that would also “help the beachside.”)

Or the $2.5 million in incentives offered to Amazon (the largest e-commerce retailer in the known universe) to locate a robotic fulfillment center at the very attractive nexus of I-95 and I-4, the millions in tax credits and $500,000 in incentives for an untested European aircraft manufacturer, the “quarterly revenue guarantees” for start-up airlines, $7.5 million in tax breaks for a new apartment complex, etc., etc., etc.   

Unfortunately, I rarely speak to the owner of an established local mom-and-pop – one that helps form the backbone of an economy historically marked by the same five people passing the same nickel around – that has received a cash infusion from public coffers…   

Over time, failing to acknowledge the challenges we face in Volusia County while constantly “polishing the turd” has resulted in trust issues. 

An uneasy sense we have been lied to by those we elected and appointed to represent our interests – and taken advantage of when local governments use our own tax dollars to pick winners and losers – by skewing the playing field.

In my view, cynicism is the unacknowledged consequence of the strategic decision to craft an overly optimistic narrative and embellish the impacts of the latest corporate welfare scheme that ultimately leaves We, The Little People groaning an apathetic “We’ve heard it all before…”   

Look, I grew up in the Halifax area, raised a family here, and spent my entire productive life serving with a local municipal government.  Now I have three beautiful grandchildren who I sincerely hope will be able to make a happy, healthy, and productive life here on Florida’s “Fun Coast.”

No one wants our area to succeed more than I do.

I think that’s the way it’s supposed to work – leaving things better than we found them for those who come after. 

In my view, that means protecting our sensitive environment, preserving our water quality and quantity, planning for growth, reducing the impacts of development, stimulating true economic development by getting government out of the marketplace, asking government to live within its means, while focusing on adequate and safe infrastructure for existing and future residents. 

Those results don’t come from toxic positivity alone.

It takes a holistic and collaborative process where all stakeholders have substantive input (not just influential insiders with a chip in the game), where challenges are addressed in an open and honest way, and a civic vision can emerge that doesn’t rely on grandiose fabrications resulting in unrealized promises…

That’s all for me.  Happy Mother’s Day, y’all!